Jump to content


Photo

The Ultimate Photo Thread


  • Please log in to reply
3467 replies to this topic

#3241 mamona

mamona

    Shiner Minnow

  • Members
  • 33 posts

Posted 16 August 2016 - 09:12 AM

Wow, what a beauty, What did you use?


  • 0

#3242 fenwickfisher

fenwickfisher

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 191 posts

Posted 16 August 2016 - 11:48 AM

Seems the atlantics are making a comeback....more and more being caught all the time...good to see hard work and millions of dollars paying off
  • 0

#3243 Huronfly

Huronfly

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 131 posts

Posted 21 August 2016 - 05:41 PM

Seems the atlantics are making a comeback....more and more being caught all the time...good to see hard work and millions of dollars paying off

 

Its only because they are stocking that CRAP out of them, finding a wild one would be like finding a unicorn lol. The program is not working...


  • 0

#3244 Guest_tossing iron_*

Guest_tossing iron_*
  • Guests

Posted 21 August 2016 - 06:20 PM

Agreed 100%. Just a bunch of higher ups trying to stretch their employment till retirement. Total waste of our cash.
And hatchery space. JOKE
  • 0

#3245 NADO

NADO

    Unaccomplished Steelheader

  • Moderators
  • 3,064 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 12:42 PM

Is it too early to open the fall fishing season?

 

 

 

What a fish, its amazing seeing the catch numbers go up year after year.


  • 0

#3246 trouttamer

trouttamer

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 136 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 01:25 PM

The destruction of steelhead from the ganaraska is next in line for the atlantic program, they already screwed the credit now the ganny is next.

I think they had a dozen or so go through the ladder at the credit last year. whats that like 1 return per million introduced,.0001 percent

Darrin


  • 0

#3247 Guest_tossing iron_*

Guest_tossing iron_*
  • Guests

Posted 22 August 2016 - 01:56 PM

What a fish, its amazing seeing the catch numbers go up year after year.

Not what I'm seeing.
They keep return numbers so secret it's next to impossible to find any.
What I did find.
2011 33 returns
2012 20
2013 9
Numbers above are for the Credit.
So much backlash on these numbers they now hide them quite well. Lol
  • 0

#3248 NADO

NADO

    Unaccomplished Steelheader

  • Moderators
  • 3,064 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 02:22 PM

Those numbers aren't right, there have been years where I have seen more than 9 pictures of Atlantics caught in the credit let alone total returned.


  • 0

#3249 Guest_tossing iron_*

Guest_tossing iron_*
  • Guests

Posted 22 August 2016 - 02:32 PM

Only one way to prove #s
Make the whole program transparent.
Which they'll never do.
Spin doctors hard at work.
Yeah we'll all just take their word everything going as planned. Lol
20yrs from now maybe runs of 40.
  • 0

#3250 fishfreek

fishfreek

    Perch

  • Active Members
  • 887 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 03:47 PM

No fish in the credit......don't waste your time.


  • 0

#3251 trouttamer

trouttamer

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 136 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 06:18 PM

if they put even 5% of the cash theyd dropped on atlantics into steelhead wed have a great fishery and wouldn't be saying where are the fish. once atlantics start being stocked in the ganny steelhead will be forgotten about. It seems they only want to drop money on atlantics and lakers because they are native to the great lakes, steelhead, browns  coho Chinook and pink are all introduced species so no one seems to care about them anymore. all you have to do is look at the US steelhead where they stock heavily have great returns and can support a put and take fishery. The amount of fisherman taking fish for meat and eggs is massive compared to the 80s and 90s where they was less pressure and more fish.

If you support the atlantic program you need to give your head a shake and look deeper into what is really happening to our fragile fishery.

Darrin


  • 1

#3252 fenwickfisher

fenwickfisher

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 191 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 08:21 PM

So say they introduced a species to newfoundland that thrived and overtook the atlantics there.....would it be foolish to want the atlantics to make a comeback?
  • 0

#3253 fenwickfisher

fenwickfisher

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 191 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 08:29 PM

Dont get me wrong im all for the steelhead fishery we have(salmon species included) but i mean if your grass was replaced by poison ivy wouldn't you want your grass back lol
  • 0

#3254 trouttamer

trouttamer

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 136 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 09:32 PM

atlantics did not become extinct because of species introduction, Its because of pollution, de forestation and high water temperatures. Sure the lake is a bit less polluted but headwaters and lower sections are urbanized water temperatures remain high, no trees for shade or bank stabilization. Why would they make a comeback under basically the same conditions in which they became extinct


  • 0

#3255 Guest_tossing iron_*

Guest_tossing iron_*
  • Guests

Posted 22 August 2016 - 09:48 PM

Coho
Bump up the Coho #s
Can the Atlantic salmon.
Pun intended
  • 0

#3256 JCRG

JCRG

    Shiner Minnow

  • Members
  • 27 posts

Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:07 PM

Dont get me wrong im all for the steelhead fishery we have(salmon species included) but i mean if your grass was replaced by poison ivy wouldn't you want your grass back lol


Nonsense
  • 0

#3257 Fishbully

Fishbully

    Shiner Minnow

  • Members
  • 46 posts

Posted 23 August 2016 - 02:07 AM

The stocking of atlantics time, resources and money. Direct from the "Bring Back the Salmon; Lake Ontario" website

The first efforts to maintain or even restore the declining Atlantic salmon population of Lake Ontario, one of the first species in Canada to be decimated by human activities, were made by Samuel Wilmot. In 1866 he established the first government-sponsored fish hatchery in North America in Newcastle, Ontario. His efforts seemed to initially pay off, as population increases were observed in many streams. However, the numbers fell again, and by 1881 observers were reporting very few fish. The species was officially declared extirpated in 1896, and the last reliable report of a harvested Atlantic salmon was in 1898.

It goes on to talk about failed attempts at stocking in other regions, the last paragraph reads;

In Ontario, the next effort to restore Atlantic salmon was undertaken by the Department of Lands and Forests (MNRF’s predecessor) in the 1940’s using Miramichi, NB stock. After five years of stocking, mortalities were still significant from high summer stream temperatures and predation upon juvenile Atlantic salmon, and the attempt was stopped. Sporadic stocking occurred up until 1964 without success, and efforts were halted as the entire ecosystem was considered too degraded to make restoration likely. It was not until 1985 that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) again attempted to stock Atlantic salmon into Lake Ontario.

Stockin Atlantics has been proven time and time again to be futile, and whats worse is that they acknowledge there has not been success in the last 150 years. The only thing to be accomplished from this is wasted money and unbalance in already sustained fisheries
  • 0

#3258 fenwickfisher

fenwickfisher

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 191 posts

Posted 23 August 2016 - 04:46 AM

.
  • 0

#3259 fenwickfisher

fenwickfisher

    Sunfish

  • Members
  • 191 posts

Posted 23 August 2016 - 05:00 AM

This is a link from the exact same website saying there was in fact enough atlantics to support a commercial fishery....i understand that ontario is not what it used to be 150 years ago ...all im saying is that they were once there in greater numbers than most believe. http://www.bringback.../early-history/
  • 0

#3260 Knuguy

Knuguy

    Smallmouth Bass

  • Active Members
  • 996 posts

Posted 23 August 2016 - 08:42 AM

ooops, I thought this was a photo thread. My mistake....I guess.


  • 0