x2I agree I would rather see a fish eaten than destroyed but I don't think that I'd eat anyting out of Lake Ontario at least not more than once a month and even then...I think you are lucky to live in a place like Alaska where the water is clean and free of contaminants.
|
Stringers and Catch and Keep POLICY PLEASE
#81
Posted 28 December 2012 - 09:52 PM
|
#82
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:32 PM
sad right?....i am blessed to be able to simply enjoy fishing as it is the polar opposite of what i do all day--i am not that stressed about it...PS never flaunted new equipment...just sharing the passion my friend.all those poor orvis's will never see a good bend
#83
Posted 29 December 2012 - 02:41 PM
Schnip you always flaunt new equipment. Before you seemed extremely jacked to catch a steelhead, now you don't even care about catching any fishsad right?....i am blessed to be able to simply enjoy fishing as it is the polar opposite of what i do all day--i am not that stressed about it...PS never flaunted new equipment...just sharing the passion my friend.
#84
Posted 29 December 2012 - 04:38 PM
#85
Posted 29 December 2012 - 04:49 PM
Steelhead love biting stuff that are connected to an Orvis
ever since i switched to Simms/Kingpin i can't keep them of my hook
#86
Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:38 PM
#87
Posted 30 December 2012 - 05:08 PM
IMHO i think we should encourage C&R, the view of a stringer should be discouraged, but not "ripped on".
I agree with NADO, that the post in question was not ripping on anyone even though it seems to have been interpreted that way.
#88
Posted 30 December 2012 - 06:31 PM
Ok really??? I've been reading this and really am astounded. Yes I know I'm new to this forum, yes I know I'm new to going after Trout..but I can tell you without a doubt, that the first 2 fish I ever manage to catch are coming home with me! Stringer or sittting in the snow...they are homeward bound and destined for my plate! Anything after that..back they go..but really..if it's legal..who gives a rats a$$ if it's on a stringer and headed for a plate? C'mon now people, we are not talking about 'white bucket' people here, but people that want to show off their fish and be proud of what they managed to accomplish! I can tell you that *if* I finally manage to land a Rainbow I'm going to be proud as heck and would love to show it off! If someone jacks me for having it on a stringer?.....bring it....I've been fishing a long time and always try and look to the future when it comes to catch and release..but honestly...if I'm within the law, and it's coming to my table...who the heck is anyone to gainsay my decision? Nobody...plain and simple. You may not know me, and I may not know you..but as long as we all look out for the sport then it's all good!
Cheers!
Sure, keep your 2 trout limit and C & R for the rest of the day. The question is, what will happen if you hook into a fish that inhaled your bait, bleeding from the gills, and goes belly up when you try to release them back to the water? Or maybe you played the fish out too long and the fish isn't reviving properly? Not saying that you are, but if you are using trout roe from a previous catch and have two trout on a stringer, you're already over your limit.
Like you said, you're a noob to trout fishing and wouldn't want you to be explaining to a MNR officer why you're over your limit. Sometimes, it's better to be humble than be a show off.
#89
Posted 30 December 2012 - 07:00 PM
Sure, keep your 2 trout limit and C & R for the rest of the day. The question is, what will happen if you hook into a fish that inhaled your bait, bleeding from the gills, and goes belly up when you try to release them back to the water? Or maybe you played the fish out too long and the fish isn't reviving properly? Not saying that you are, but if you are using trout roe from a previous catch and have two trout on a stringer, you're already over your limit.
Like you said, you're a noob to trout fishing and wouldn't want you to be explaining to a MNR officer why you're over your limit. Sometimes, it's better to be humble than be a show off.
I should probably clarify my statement! Yep, I'm a n00b to trout fishing, but what I actually meant was...*if* I managed to hook any fish in a day (say two for arguments sake)...then my day is over! I've fished other species long enough that I'm not going to take a chance on getting booked for being over limit, either on a stringer or possession. Would I perhaps keep another once I've eaten those two...probably...as I wouldn't mind a nice Bow dinner once in a while, but otherwise it's C&R.
Sorry if I wasn't clear! C&R is a great thing for those up and coming behind us!
Cheers!
P.S...unless I'm mistaken, having roe from a previous catch would not be over your limit unless you have 2 fish in the freezer (thereby being over on possession?). Yes, I absolutely agree..much better to be humble than a show off. LOL...but if I at some point *do* manage to land one....yep, I'm going to be a show off! LOL!!
#90
Posted 30 December 2012 - 09:01 PM
Wow that's a positive way to look at it.Sure, keep your 2 trout limit and C & R for the rest of the day. The question is, what will happen if you hook into a fish that inhaled your bait, bleeding from the gills, and goes belly up when you try to release them back to the water? Or maybe you played the fish out too long and the fish isn't reviving properly? Not saying that you are, but if you are using trout roe from a previous catch and have two trout on a stringer, you're already over your limit.
Like you said, you're a noob to trout fishing and wouldn't want you to be explaining to a MNR officer why you're over your limit. Sometimes, it's better to be humble than be a show off.
#91
Posted 01 January 2013 - 06:05 AM
This thread is redundant (from the outset)
MNR guidelines are quite explicit regarding proper handling of fish and catch quotas.
Want to keep a fish...up to you...C + R...up to you.
DONE
cc
Totally Agree!!
"Locking It Up" might be doing "Some" of us a Favour! The "Back Biting" and some of the Content is Way Past Reasonable!
Before anyone starts Throwing Stones .... This is My Opinion ONLY! YOU do what YOU Believe is Right. ...... I'LL do the Same.
Happy New Year!!
#92
Posted 01 January 2013 - 07:19 PM
Not saying that you are, but if you are using trout roe from a previous catch and have two trout on a stringer, you're already over your limit.
please explain this, i have seen nothing in the regs about roe being counted towards your catch limit, if this were the case, you might as well throw salmon roe in there as well, since the trout and salmon limit are an aggregate limit
#93
Posted 01 January 2013 - 07:43 PM
please explain this, i have seen nothing in the regs about roe being counted towards your catch limit, if this were the case, you might as well throw salmon roe in there as well, since the trout and salmon limit are an aggregate limit
Its a possession limit not catch limit
#94
Posted 01 January 2013 - 07:56 PM
How does this work?
#95
Posted 01 January 2013 - 08:52 PM
#96
Posted 01 January 2013 - 08:52 PM
x2Roe counts towards your limit???? wtf lol
How does this work?
Well i dont keep any fish, this just sounds weird
#97
Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:16 PM
Its a possession limit not catch limit
potato potahdo
i have still yet to see anything where it says roe counts towards your limit. if i buy my roe, i didn't harvest a fish to get it.
#98
Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:24 PM
Having said that, CO's have enough problems to worry about, that they will never in a million years ticket you strictly for having a little bit of roe push you 1 over the limit. If you have a conservation license, 2 salmon in the freezer, and a little bit of rainbow roe that you kept from the spring, no need to throw out your rainbow roe. Just be aware that roe is technically part of the fish, and next time around be more vigilant.
Also, if you purchased your roe, just as if you were to purchase your fish, this does not count as part of your possession limit. If you bought a 10 pack of salmon fillets at the store, or if you bought 1lb of rainbow roe, this has no bearing on your possession limit.
#99
Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:39 PM
If you have any part of a fish, then it counts towards your limit. Since roe is part of the fish, if you have roe left over from a female but no meat left, it's still counting as 1 fish towards your possession limit.
Having said that, CO's have enough problems to worry about, that they will never in a million years ticket you strictly for having a little bit of roe push you 1 over the limit. If you have a conservation license, 2 salmon in the freezer, and a little bit of rainbow roe that you kept from the spring, no need to throw out your rainbow roe. Just be aware that roe is technically part of the fish, and next time around be more vigilant.
Also, if you purchased your roe, just as if you were to purchase your fish, this does not count as part of your possession limit. If you bought a 10 pack of salmon fillets at the store, or if you bought 1lb of rainbow roe, this has no bearing on your possession limit.
Yup...
There is technically a bunch of regs on how to transport fish properly too so that Ministry Officials can accurately identify species, size (for slot purposes), quantity.
May 24th they often check coolers in vehicles towing boats, and will fine if fillets are skinned and processed already.
#100
Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:08 PM
Yup...
There is technically a bunch of regs on how to transport fish properly too so that Ministry Officials can accurately identify species, size (for slot purposes), quantity.
May 24th they often check coolers in vehicles towing boats, and will fine if fillets are skinned and processed already.
Yes always leave a piece of skin if transporting just the fillets.
If I was a CO, rather than give a fine, I'd say "So, you say these are walleye and perch, and not out of season bass and muskie, eh? I will get my portable grill, we're going to have to do a taste test."
|