|
Stringers and Catch and Keep POLICY PLEASE
#61
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:17 AM
|
#62
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:48 AM
#63
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:49 AM
#64
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:13 AM
More river for me! XD
#65
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:37 AM
#66
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:47 AM
Why the hell would you say that?? Are you nuts!!?? This is a forum, don't post what you're thinking in your head about someone!!!schnip you are not very bright are you.
I think you're not very bright to say something like that.
#67
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:53 AM
#68
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:54 AM
#69
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:02 AM
WTF ??hahahaha as hilarious as that is and the awesome timing of CJR post--its overboard--lol even for my standards---i would like to tell you all that it is unsafe to have any sexual relations with any animals and most diffucult with fish as they live and breath in water....
#70
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:17 AM
Saturday for surethe real question is who is fishing this saturday?
#71
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:38 AM
#72
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:26 PM
This thread is redundant (from the outset)
MNR guidelines are quite explicit regarding proper handling of fish and catch quotas.
Want to keep a fish...up to you...C + R...up to you.
DONE
cc
#73
Posted 28 December 2012 - 05:47 PM
#74
Posted 28 December 2012 - 07:12 PM
its my bad--having a little too much fun...
this is what you call fun? trolling our forum? posting nonsense? Have you ever posted a successful report or has it all just been brand bashing, harassing and flaunting new gear ?
#75
Posted 28 December 2012 - 07:15 PM
#76
Posted 28 December 2012 - 07:17 PM
IMO, I rather see a fish on a stringer knowing it will get eaten than most pics of steelhead and browns thrown on the gravel, grass and sand for a photo and released (as is common on many threads). just my two cents. I am strictly C&R for all species except salmon here, however, who am I to say anything to someone harvesting one of them if they do it legally? We already have stipulations about backgrounds, now we have to try and keep stringer fish photos off too? Pretty rediculous if you ask me. There are enough rules in place as it is....
x2...
Just last week I saw 10 gutted fish left to rot on the bank
#77
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:11 PM
brand bashing, harassing and flaunting new gear
A streamside fashion show
#78
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:31 PM
A streamside fashion show
hehe take a picture of yourself in your simms with your KP imperial, and pm him
#79
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:53 PM
Ugh... Ive seen way too much of that this yearx2...
Just last week I saw 10 gutted fish left to rot on the bank
#80
Posted 28 December 2012 - 09:46 PM
IMO, I rather see a fish on a stringer knowing it will get eaten than most pics of steelhead and browns thrown on the gravel, grass and sand for a photo and released (as is common on many threads). just my two cents. I am strictly C&R for all species except salmon here, however, who am I to say anything to someone harvesting one of them if they do it legally? We already have stipulations about backgrounds, now we have to try and keep stringer fish photos off too? Pretty rediculous if you ask me. There are enough rules in place as it is....
I agree I would rather see a fish eaten than destroyed but I don't think that I'd eat anyting out of Lake Ontario at least not more than once a month and even then...I think you are lucky to live in a place like Alaska where the water is clean and free of contaminants.
|