ChaseChrome
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 2,448
Fixed...
Awsome!!!!ChaseChrome said:Fixed...
Giuga10 said:That rule only goes for the Steehead and Salmon section.
Care to explain Chase? I see no change in the rules...ChaseChrome said:Nope
basically CC gets to erase the names of rivers he choses or may fish, but other places like the whirlpool he lets slide?FishingNoob said:Care to explain Chase? I see no change in the rules...
Ohhh ok.leakywaders said:basically CC gets to erase the names of rivers he choses or may fish, but other places like the whirlpool he lets slide?
Nopeleakywaders said:basically CC gets to erase the names of rivers he choses or may fish, but other places like the whirlpool he lets slide?
wow reallyleakywaders said:basically CC gets to erase the names of rivers he choses or may fish, but other places like the whirlpool he lets slide?
So then why don't you explain?ChaseChrome said:Nope
34ric said:Seems like this thread needs more photos... I went today to try and chase some browns....ended up back in brookie waters which still produced in the mid afternoon on dries. Quite the hike today too..
What the hell are you asking me to explain when, not long ago, Openfire decided that ALL naming of sensitve sytems in the Southern Ontario basin would be subject to this rule. This is not an arbitrary or unilateral intervention so I really have no idea what you're driving at or why you feel it necessary to re-open a debate settled some time ago. I responded to several members who expressed deep concern.FishingNoob said:So then why don't you explain?
Then perhaps the notice posted above the salmon and steelhead section can be posted here? I really had no idea that was the rule, as it is not publicly announced anywhere but the salmon and steelhead section. Wasn't trying to rehash the debate, just wanted clarification on the rules. Jeez man.ChaseChrome said:What the hell are you asking me to explain when, not long ago, Openfire decided that ALL naming of sensitve sytems in the Southern Ontario basin would be subject to this rule. This is not an arbitrary or unilateral intervention so I really have no idea what you're driving at or why you feel it necessary to re-open a debate settled some time ago. I responded to several members who expressed deep concern.
I hope this is satisfactory to you and leaky.