NADO
Unaccomplished Steelheader
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 3,064
Exactly Joel, Hammercarp is trying to take a regulation that was created for another reason put his own interpretation on it and then apply it to a different scenario that is rare enough that there isnt a real need to make a regulation about it or even discuss it. This is a completely opinionated argument that probably cant go anywhere ie. you can argue that the hook is in the mouth of the fish as the fish swallowed both fish and hook , i'm not saying that my argument but you get the point....Kind of a juvenile discussion.