Stringers and Catch and Keep POLICY PLEASE

Ontario Fishing Forums

Help Support Ontario Fishing Forums:

hahahaha as hilarious as that is and the awesome timing of CJR post--its overboard--lol even for my standards---i would like to tell you all that it is unsafe to have any sexual relations with any animals and most diffucult with fish as they live and breath in water....again CJR i love a good toe to toe thread like this but your post was amazing---i rarely tip my hat to anyone however ---as rusty said well played.
 
hahahaha as hilarious as that is and the awesome timing of CJR post--its overboard--lol even for my standards---i would like to tell you all that it is unsafe to have any sexual relations with any animals and most diffucult with fish as they live and breath in water....
WTF ??
 
I was out this morning battling snow and I was still thinking about this thread. Actually slipped on 3 feet of ice cold water w/ no waders (i know it isn't the smart thing to do)...battling a 2lb...dark 'bow...landed & released...driving home in shorts and slippers is a B#tch but i'm still smiling. Pike till the 31st.
 
IMO, I rather see a fish on a stringer knowing it will get eaten than most pics of steelhead and browns thrown on the gravel, grass and sand for a photo and released (as is common on many threads). just my two cents. I am strictly C&R for all species except salmon here, however, who am I to say anything to someone harvesting one of them if they do it legally? We already have stipulations about backgrounds, now we have to try and keep stringer fish photos off too? Pretty rediculous if you ask me. There are enough rules in place as it is....
 
IMO, I rather see a fish on a stringer knowing it will get eaten than most pics of steelhead and browns thrown on the gravel, grass and sand for a photo and released (as is common on many threads). just my two cents. I am strictly C&R for all species except salmon here, however, who am I to say anything to someone harvesting one of them if they do it legally? We already have stipulations about backgrounds, now we have to try and keep stringer fish photos off too? Pretty rediculous if you ask me. There are enough rules in place as it is....


x2...

Just last week I saw 10 gutted fish left to rot on the bank
 
IMO, I rather see a fish on a stringer knowing it will get eaten than most pics of steelhead and browns thrown on the gravel, grass and sand for a photo and released (as is common on many threads). just my two cents. I am strictly C&R for all species except salmon here, however, who am I to say anything to someone harvesting one of them if they do it legally? We already have stipulations about backgrounds, now we have to try and keep stringer fish photos off too? Pretty rediculous if you ask me. There are enough rules in place as it is....

I agree I would rather see a fish eaten than destroyed but I don't think that I'd eat anyting out of Lake Ontario at least not more than once a month and even then...I think you are lucky to live in a place like Alaska where the water is clean and free of contaminants. :)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top